做MATCHING 题目时，最重要的一点就是找到关键词。拿到一篇文章后，首先浏览文章标题，然后把题目中列出的关键词逐个找到，并将该词所在的句子用线划出。然后，我们就可以根据划线句子的意思与问题给出的备选项进行对照，意思相近或相符的那一句就应该是正确答案。发现两个句子意思相近或相符的关键是找原句中的同义词或近义词，这样就可大大减少阅读量，从而能在较短的时间内找到答案。如果答案不能在出现关键词的句子中找到，就应从该句的上下文中去寻找答案。还有些时候，你会发现关键词在好几个句子中都出现了。这时，你可以将这几个句子都划出来，与备选项中的句子逐个对照，意思相近的就是正确选项。 还有一个需要注意的问题是，每选定一个答案后，应把已选好的选项用线划掉，以免影响后面的判断。 下面，我们就以下文为例具体进行分析。 Geophysics For Utility Location: When It Works - When It Won’t Utility companies， construction projects， and highway contractors are often faced with the need to excavate or pipe-jack in the vicinity of known or suspected buried utility lines， drains， or other subsurface structures. In many cases， particularly where they are adjacent to highways， the lateral position of the lines may be umented with reasonable accuracy， but the vertical position， or burial depth， may be uncertain due to changes in grade caused by construction or maintenance performed after the pipes were buried. One way to verify the location of such buried objects is to cautiously dig a trial pit to expose the object in question. However， digging such a pit in or close to a highway is costly because of the need for traffic control， and subsequent reinstatement of the surface to meet the original specification. There is also a substantial risk of accident and personal injury， partly due to the disruption caused to the highway traffic， and partly due to the nature of the work. Where mechanical digging equipment is used， an unumented or misaligned utility line can easily be damaged if the excavation workers do not observe it. Gas and electricity lines present very obvious safety threats in this situation. These factors have caused utility engineers and contractors to search for alternative methods to locate subsurface structures， often with mixed success. There are several geophysical techniques with proven capabilities in non-intrusive subsurface investigation， but there are less publicized limitations to these methods that potential specifies and users should be aware of if they are to avoid inconclusive or misleading survey reports. Practical Near-Surface Techniques The real driving force behind the development of geophysical survey methods was the search for oil and other valuable mineral deposits. The earlier methods were therefore primarily focused on the detection and identification of relatively large geological formations at depths that were typically measured in several hundreds of feet. Such methods do not have the resolution to detect small objects， such as pipelines and cables， buried only a few feet deep. A few methods， however， were either developed specifically for near-surface work， or were readily adaptable to the task of locating relatively small objects at shallow burial depths. The most commonly used methods in current utility location practice are: Ground Penetrating Radar Magnetometer/Gradiometer Non-contact Conductivity Specialized Utility Locators These methods have been proven to be very effective in the right conditions， but all have limitations that can render them inconclusive， or worse still， misleading， if used or interpreted by an inexperienced operator. Where soil conditions are appropriate， GPR can provide the most complete and accurate information about buried structures and utility lines， but requires a carefully laid out survey grid or pattern if the maximum accuracy is to be obtained from the survey profiles. GPR will detect non-magnetic or non-conductive lines such as plastic gas pipes. GPR is not suitable for use in locating objects deeper than about 3 feet or so in moist clay or silty clay soils， but since it is measuring soil dielectric properties， it can give useful information about the lateral extent of disturbed soils or backfill areas， even where a utility line is not identified due to signal attenuation. For reconnaissance-level surveys， where it is required to sweep large areas of open land for buried structures， EM conductivity surveys will be much more economical than GPR， but will provide little or no useful depth information. EM will not directly detect non-conductive material such as plastic gas pipe， but will usually identify the conductivity anomaly caused by the backfill around the pipe. Magnetometer， Gradiometer， and electro-magnetic or RF utility locators are generally best employed for tracing the route of a utility line when a physical connection to the line can be made at one end， or in a manhole or trial pit. The methods will not work with plain plastic pipe such as older gas transmission lines. If the plastic pipe has been installed with marker magnets at the couplers， wire markers， or conductive tape laid in the excavation， then these tools might be considered. In the author’s experience， the most efficient survey program for a location where no accurate utility information is available is to use EM for an initial search， then use GPR to refine the data in areas where EM indicated conductivity anomalies. A magnetic plastic gas pipe has been developed under the auspices of the Gas Research Institute， and is currently being evaluated under field conditions. If the durability of the material lives up to expectations， and the cost becomes competitive with current gas line products， location of the new lines will be greatly simplified， and current utility location tools will become much more useful. Choose one phrase from the List of phrases to complete each Key point below. The information in the completed sentences should be an accurate summary of the points made by the writer. NB. There are more phrases than sentences， so you will not need to use them all. You may use each phrase once only. Key point 1. Utility companies … 2. Trial pits … 3. Mechanical digging equipment … 4. Geophysical survey methods … 5. GPR … 6. EM conductivity survey … 7. The development of a magnetic plastic gas pipe … List of phrases A. dig holes to bury utility lines B. are dug to expose subsurface structures C. damages easily unumented utility lines D. often need to dig holes near some subsurface structures E. are developed to search valuable mineral deposits F. are dug to confirm the location of a subsurface structure G. provides little useful depth information H. always provides the most complete and accurate information I. can detect very small objects J. can detect plastic gas pipes K. will be evaluated L. uses gas and electricity M. is likely to make it easier to locate the lines Q1. Utility companies... MultipleChoiceQuestion的延伸阅读——雅思阅读备考技巧与方法，两全其美网校城编辑与你总结分析
雅思阅读的题型一直是考生比较关注的问题，分析认为主要有以下两个原因： 1. 有相对简单和相对费时的题型; 2.每个考生都有自己擅长的和较害怕的题型。具体来说：对于词汇不足的考生可能最害怕段落标题匹配题及摘要归纳填空题;对于词汇量较大的考生来说，是非无判断题，段落标题匹配题和摘要归纳填空题可能是比较简单的。选择题和其它匹配题是相对来说比较费时的，所以大部分考生都很害怕这类题型。 那么，面对上面所提到的这些情况，考生应该在题型方面怎样备考呢? 首先，专家认为考生必须从心理上准备迎接所有的题型，在备考中要尽可能喜欢所有题型。有的考生会一次次地祈祷：“希望这次考试不要有选择题或段落细节信息定位题!”这样做，其实是无形中给自己制造了负面的影响。考试题型不是我们所能预料和控制的，一旦有了上述心理，很有可能一看到题型就慌了，一开始就没有一个好的状态。还有一部份考生喜欢跟着考题回忆和机经走，看到上次考了什么题就在备考中只关注那些题型。考题回忆和机经可以看看，但只能做参考，考生千万不要被它们所左右。否则就是自己给自己制造障碍。 其次，考生必须对各类题型的题型特点和答题注意事项了如指掌。雅思阅读考试时间之短，文章之学术性，题量之大，题型之多等特点决定了考生势必会感觉时间不够。考生要在有限的时间内答完所有的题并尽可能地保证较高的正确率确实不是一件容易的事情。考生除了要有一定的词汇量和阅读速度之外，常见的雅思阅读技巧和解题策略是必须的。而解题策略很多时候是建立在考生熟悉题型特点的基础之上的。比如说，考生拿到一篇文章绝不是从第1题接到13题，而是应该分析各组题型的特点和难易，由易到难。同样，考生也可以根据3篇各自的题型来初步判断哪一篇的题型可能对自己比较有利，那篇可能较难，以便能灵活地采取合适的策略。 最后，专家建议考生在考前进行练习时，不要光做套题，而应该偶尔穿插一些专题的练习，重点练习自己没什么把握的题型。注意练习时时间的掌控是很重要的，不要给自己30分钟完成6道是非无，那样不能达到训练的目的，不能保证良好的效果。 |
