两全其美网校城

关注网校微信
一手全掌握!

新东方GRE issue范文20篇(一)

2011-10-26 16:33| 投稿者: bjangel| 评论: 2

摘要: 新东方GRE issue范文20篇(一)"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer ...
新东方GRE issue范文20篇(一)

"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."


[Sample Essay]


The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.


The above statement is much too broad, however. "Anyone" covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that "anyone" subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?


Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's name in a newspaper constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone's life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person's reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual's reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.


Without a doubt, there are many examples of individual's whose reputations have been diminished by media scrutiny. The media's uncovering of former U.S. President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky will most likely overshadow the entire eight years of his administration. Basketball superstar Michael Jordan's sterling reputation has been tarnished more than once by the media; first by media coverage of his gambling habits, then most recently (and in a much more harmful manner) by news reports of his marital infidelities and the divorce from his wife of thirteen years. Fame and fortune can turn an ordinary individual into a media target where reporters will stop at almost nothing to "dig up dirt" that will sell more newspapers or entice more viewers to watch a television program. It could even be argued that media scrutiny killed Princess Diana as her car sped away from the privacy-invading cameras of reporters in Paris. There is no doubt that there are a large number of people who have been hurt in one way or another by particularly intense media scrutiny.


In summary, it seems impossible that for every person that is subjected to media scrutiny, his or her reputation will eventually be diminished. Millions of people are mentioned in the media every day yet still manage to go about their lives unhurt by the media. Normal individuals that are subjected to media scrutiny can have their reputation either enhanced or damaged depending on the circumstances surrounding the media coverage. The likelihood of a diminished reputation from the media rises proportionally with the level of notoriety that an individual possesses and the outrageousness of that person's behavior. The length of time in the spotlight can also be a determining factor, as the longer the person is examined in the media, the greater the possibility that damaging information will be discovered or that the individual will do something to disparage his or her reputation. But to broadly state that media scrutiny will diminish anyone's reputation is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given a long enough time and a certain level of intensity of coverage, the media may damage a person's reputation.


(766words)


    汉译对照


    [题目]


    "被置于媒体审视下的任何人,其名誉终将受毁损。"


    [嘉文博译范文]


    当今媒体报道的力度,由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类,从而被极大地增强。围绕着对最具暴露性的图片及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争,使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也转变为所谓的"媒体疯狂"。由于竞争的本质,记者们被迫就某一项报道作深度采访,以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。随着这类媒体报道的出现,任何被置于媒体报道之下的人,其名誉越来越有可能被玷污,因为"金无赤金,人无完人"。每个人都有可能犯错误。技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。技术也使媒体得以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去,从而更增加了当事人名誉受损的可能性。


    然则,上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。"任何人"涵盖了世界上所有的人。有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。也有些人,其名声早就如此之糟糕,以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏的毁损。笼统地陈述受媒体报道的"任何人"均会使其地位被玷污,这暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。那么,对于天真无辜的孩子们,尤其新生婴儿,情况会如何?对于那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说,情况又会是什么样呢?


    对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言,它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。只在报纸上提及一个人的名字,是否算作媒体聚焦?对某人一生中单独一次事件(如婚礼或孩子出生)的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗?媒体对消防队员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道,难道也会毁损该人的名声吗?在这些实例中,其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。虽然这些人可能被置于媒体审视之下,但其名声却会完好无损,且潜在地可因这些披露而得以提高。 毫无疑问,也有许多例子能证明一个人的名声会被媒体审视所毁损。媒体对美国前总统Bill Clinton与Monica Lewinsky的风流韵事的揭露极有可能会将其八年的执政生涯置于阴影之中。超级篮球明星Michael Jordan一世英名也被媒体不止一次地玷污,首先是被有关其赌习的媒体报道,其次是最近--且以一种更具致命性伤害的方式--被有关他婚姻不忠以及与其结婚13年的妻子分道扬镳的报道。当媒体记者不择手段去挖掘某些可促使其报纸销量大增的"猛料"时,或去诱惑更多的观众观看某一电视节目时,名和利就会将一个普通人转变为媒体追踪的目标。我们甚至可以提出这样一种论点,即正是媒体的审视将Diana王妃置于死地,随着她的汽车去竭力逃脱巴黎街头的记者们那侵犯隐私的相机镜头。毫无疑问,肯定有许多人被极其强烈的媒体聚焦以一种方式或另一种方式所伤害。


    归纳而言,对于每个被置于媒体审视的人来说,其名声将最终受到毁损似乎并不可能。每天,有数百万人被媒体提到,但他们仍设法我行我素,不为媒体所伤害。被置于媒体审视之下的普通人,其名声或可得到提高,或可蒙受毁损,取决于围绕着媒体报道的具体情况。一个人的名声受媒体毁损的可能性,与所其拥有的臭名昭著的程度,及其行为的令人厌恶程度成正比。受媒体关注的时间长短同样也是一个决定性因素,因为一个人被媒体审视的时间越长,于他名声不利的信息越有可能被抖落出来,或者该人越有可能去做出某些于其名声不利的事情。但只是笼统地陈述媒体的审视终将毁掉一个人的名声,即是过分夸大这样一种显著的可能性,即在足够长的时间和一度程度的报道力度这两个条件下,媒体是有可能毁掉一个人的名声的。
        新东方GRE issue范文20篇(一)之外的更多相关信息,请访问: 新东方网校 新东方gre网络课堂 gre写作复习资料
两全其美网校城,荟萃了著名网院和网校的超过10000门免费和收费网络课程!

新东方GRE网络课堂>>

新东方GRE

发表评论

最新评论

引用 游客 2014-5-14 04:01
しばらく道を戻って、時間をおいてからその公園を再び横切る。僕もそうだった。「そうしてるうちにさ、俺もお前の事が気になっていたんだ。はぅ、誰なの、この可愛い子はめちゃくちゃ可愛いし、胸も大きくて綺麗そうだしハッ、ライバル出現!そうだな、次はどこに行こうか」 桜華の行動にはすべて意味がある。お仕置きはよくない」 今にも結衣ちゃんのほっぺをつまもうとする不満げな彼女を止める。」 「それじゃ、少し付き合ってくれませんか?」 物騒かつ不吉な台詞に私は天音ちゃんに尋ね返す。ホントに欲しいモノが手に入らないなら、それは私には何もないと同じなんです』 どんなに優秀な能力を持っていても、それを持つ本人がその力を不要に感じていれば意味がなくなる。「きっと見られるよ。中々、踏み込んでいいのか分からない事も多くて。彼女もそう言う雑誌を読んだりするんだろうか。早く綺羅と仲お直りしなくては。誰だって秘密のひとつやふたつはある。「悠クン、そーいえばまた姉さんが部屋に泊まったでしょ。「さぁて、新聞部はどこにあったかしら?私達はもう学園中に恋人だって宣言しちゃったの!マネージャーさんは美人だし、共演している女の子も可愛 ...
引用 游客 2014-5-13 16:29
何で、京司クンが女の子を呼び捨てってもしかして、えっ、どういうこと?」 何やらひとり呟きながら困惑する生徒会長。」 咲良の部屋に隠してもらっていた俺のコレクションの数々がしまいこまれた箱。 なんか妙なタイミングで見つけるから、怪しいとは思ってたんだよ。私もあと3時間ほどで帰るから」 「はいはい。風呂の準備くらいしておくよ。他に必要な物は」 夢月は両親と共にオーケストラの練習、彼女の声がないと我が家はずいぶんと静かだ。 「あら、お兄様。「双葉との電話は何だったの?」 「いろいろと、話したよ。あと、北欧関係の言葉なら日常会話程度は十分できるよ」 「夢月は昔から自分の好きなものは何でも覚えが早いものね。他は全然だけど」 「それ、どーいう意味?彼女は「試合、惜しかったわね」と慰めてくれる。 「良い所までは行ったんだけど、負けてしまった。」 些細な事でも元雪様を知るたびに私は嬉しくなる。 この人と出会うために私は生まれてきた。「お待たせ、崇弘ちゃん」 「おぅ。どこに行くのか決めたのか?だから、楽譜を放り投げようとするな。地味に痛い」 亮太と恋人になってもこういう付き合い方は全然変わらないわ。何が ...

查看全部评论(2)


考试

     
Baidu
中华会计网校 新东方网络课堂 中华会计网校会计继续教育 新东方网校 环球网校 中公网校

小黑屋|手机版|关于我们|两全其美网校城   

GMT+8, 2020-7-13 13:37

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部